The article presents three main arguments: 1. Drag queens don't discriminate (while disney does because only a handful of princesses aren't white.) 2. Drag queens work for what they have (but only one princess has a job.) and 3. Drag queens have a sense of humor (but I guess princesses don't?)
Don't get me wrong, I agree 100% that drag queens aren't discriminatory, they work hard and they know how to laugh and have a good time. All things that someone might look for in a role model. This, however, does not mean Disney princesses aren't similar in these rights.
1. The reason most Disney Princesses are white is because those movies started coming out in the 1930's, and most of them are based on even older folklore, fairytales, etc. When these princesses were being brought to life, the idea of racial equality wasn't around. The princesses race reflects the times they were thought up. It makes sense that we didn't have an African-American princess until after we came leaps and bounds in terms of racial equality. So what if the first five princesses are white? Princesses of any other race when they made their Disney debuts would have been just as big of a deal as it apparently is today for them to not be more diverse.
2. So only one princess had a paying job, but that does not mean the rest of them weren't working their asses off long before her. Cinderella spent every day hard at work doing whatever her step-mother told her to do, Pocahontas spent long hours in the fields to help sustain her tribe and Mulan trained hard to be a soldier for her country. Yes, generally "princess" means you're born into wealth and don't have to work, and while that's true of many of them, they also didn't sit around and do nothing.
3. I don't even understand this argument. Ok, so yes, drag queens do have a sense of humor and the ability to make their audiences laugh. This article, however, specifically says "I can't recall one princess with the ability to laugh at her ridiculous plights. Instead, the princesses always awaken into a smiling song" Sorry that princesses don't have a sense of humor about the fact that they were locked in towers for years, thrown into the woods alone or mistreated by an evil step-mother after suffering the loss of both parents. Would you laugh about that? As for them awakening into a smiling song, even if they don't necessarily have a sense of humor about their situations at least they're able to stay positive. Most people who have survived what these princesses went through before finding happily ever after wouldn't be laughing about it either.
So there you have all of the main arguments easily refuted, but what bothered me most about this article's opinion wasn't even one of the main arguments but rather a side note thrown in at the end:
“[Disney Princesses] are a perpetuation of the stereotype of the
weak, dumb woman who obediently waits for a man to come along and make her
valuable.”
Now I personally like to think that I'm a princess, but princess to me has never meant being weak or dumb or waiting for a man. It means the exact opposite. To me being a princess means being strong and intelligent. I also believe it means not needing a man to rely on, but that doesn't mean you can't still want to find true love.
I truly believe that Disney Princesses perfectly uphold the idea of strong, intelligent, and independent young women. Here's just a few of them who not only show what a real princess is, but are also the perfect role model:
Belle: The movie starts with literally the whole town making
fun of her for being “odd” because she’s intelligent, and all she does is
read all the time. And yes, maybe her favorite part of the book she’s reading
is when the main character meets prince charming, but despite the fact that
she’s looking for him, she doesn’t settle for the most handsome man in town who
just so happens to want to marry her. She turns him down and falls for a beast
instead. Although he may end up being a handsome prince in the end, he wasn’t
when she fell in love with him. Plus, she ended up in the Beast’s castle after
bravely going by herself through some sketchy woods to save her father, and
taking his place so that he could be free. As far as I’m concerned Belle is far
from the helpless little girl who needs a man to make her valuable. She doesn’t
care what other people think about her and she isn’t looking for a handsome man
to save her, or even a necessarily handsome man at all.
Pocahontas: If you want to find a strong, intelligent young
woman who could care less about her relationship status, look no further than
Pocahontas. She works hard to help her tribe, she knows everything there is to
know about the land around her, and she is much less than thrilled about the
idea of being married off. She wasn’t sitting around doing nothing waiting for
a man when John Smith came along, and when he did show up, she taught him more
than he ever taught her. It seems like John Smith needed Pocahontas a lot more
than she needed him.
Mulan: How many girls do you know that would pretend to be a
man and go off to a war so that their disabled father wouldn’t have to go risk
his life? Answer: none. Mulan was a badass. She survived a war and saved her entire country. I don't think anyone weak could do that. She also never sat around and waited for
a man. She didn’t even want one. She spends all that time getting prettied up
and meeting with a matchmaker not because she wants a husband, but because she
wants to bring honor to her family. Had it been up to her she probably never
would have gone to see a matchmaker in the first place. It was her family that
was pushing this idea of needing a man to make you valuable, not her own
personal views. Weak, dumb and waiting for a man is the exact opposite of
Mulan.
Jasmine: Princesses are supposed to just sit around and wait
for a man to come along and be perfectly content to do so, right? Well Jasmine
disagrees. Although that’s what her father wants her to do it is far from the
life she wants for herself. She runs away from her perfect palace and falls for
a commoner: a.k.a. a man who has no way of making her “more valuable.” And
although her attempt failed, she also ends up being the one who tries to save
him, not the other way around. When Aladdin comes back to find her, this time
as a handsome prince, she wants nothing to do with him. It isn’t until she
realizes who he really is that she falls in love with him again. Of course,
Aladdin does end up rescuing Jasmine in the end, but that isn’t to say she is
weak or dumb, and she had fallen in love with him long before he saved her.
There are plenty of examples of Disney princesses who are far from the stereotype of weak, dumb, women. And while all of these princesses do end up with a man by their side in the end, it isn't because they sat around and waited for them or because they needed them to make them more valuable. It's because whether you want to agree or not, everybody wants to find true love. These princesses are all lucky enough to have found it, and probably not because they were weak and dumb, but because they were the exact opposite.
These women were strong. These women were smart. And these women didn't need a man (not all of them even wanted one,) but they were still lucky enough to find an amazing one.
If you're looking for a character to be a good role model, I see no one more fit for the job than a Disney Princess.
If you're looking for a character to be a good role model, I see no one more fit for the job than a Disney Princess.
~Melissa Tamar
If you want to read the original article: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/joy-martinmalone/drag-queens_b_4006697.html?ncid=edlinkusaolp00000003